EMTALA billing rules: what hospitals and ERs must know
EMTALA requires a Medicare hospital with an emergency department to screen and stabilize anyone who comes in, whatever they can pay. For billing, that means registration may ask about insurance but may not let the question delay care, and 42 CFR 489.24 sets out exactly where the line sits.
In short: 42 CFR 489.24 requires a hospital with a dedicated emergency department to give every person who comes in a medical screening exam and, if an emergency medical condition exists, stabilizing treatment or an appropriate transfer. Registration may ask whether a patient is insured, but only if that does not delay care. Insurer authorization cannot be sought until after the exam and the start of stabilizing treatment.
What does EMTALA require of a hospital emergency department?
EMTALA, the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, is a federal law that Medicare enforces through the hospital's provider agreement. Under 42 CFR 489.24(a)(1), when any individual comes to a hospital's emergency department, the hospital must provide an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the department, including ancillary services routinely available to it. The duty applies whether or not the person is eligible for Medicare and regardless of ability to pay.
If the screening shows an emergency medical condition, the hospital must provide the stabilizing treatment it can within its staff and facilities, or make an appropriate transfer. Under 489.24(d)(2), the duty ends on a good-faith inpatient admission to stabilize the condition.
| Term | What 42 CFR 489.24(b) says, in plain words |
|---|---|
| Emergency medical condition | Acute symptoms, including severe pain, psychiatric disturbance or symptoms of substance abuse, severe enough that no immediate care could reasonably be expected to put health in serious jeopardy, seriously impair bodily functions or seriously damage an organ. For a pregnant woman with contractions, it also covers a case where there is no time for a safe transfer before delivery, or where transfer threatens her or the unborn child. |
| Stabilized | No material deterioration of the condition is likely, within reasonable medical probability, to result from or occur during transfer. For a woman in labor, it means she has delivered the child and the placenta. |
| Comes to the emergency department | The person presents at the dedicated ED or elsewhere on hospital property and asks for care, or someone asks on their behalf. If nobody asks, a request is treated as made when a prudent layperson would think, from appearance or behavior, that the person needs care. Arrival in a hospital-owned ambulance, or in any ambulance on hospital property, counts. |
Who does EMTALA apply to: hospitals, freestanding ERs and urgent care?
EMTALA applies to a Medicare participating hospital that has a dedicated emergency department. The definition of hospital in 489.24(b) includes critical access hospitals and rural emergency hospitals. A department counts as a dedicated emergency department if it meets any one of three tests, whether it sits on or off the main campus.
- It is licensed by the state as an emergency room or emergency department.
- It is held out to the public, by name, signs or advertising, as a place that treats emergency medical conditions on an urgent basis without an appointment.
- In the calendar year before the determination, at least one-third of its outpatient visits were for emergency medical conditions on an urgent basis without a previously scheduled appointment.
That wording decides the freestanding question. A freestanding ER that is a department of a hospital can be covered, because the test looks at the department and not the building. An independent freestanding emergency department, one that is geographically separate and licensed separately from a hospital under 45 CFR 149.30, is not a hospital under 489.24. The No Surprises Act rules still borrow the same standard for it, as the next section shows. Our freestanding ER billing guide covers how they bill.
Urgent care follows the same logic. A standalone urgent care that is not part of a hospital sits outside 489.24, while a hospital department that meets one of the three tests does not.
Can an ER ask for insurance information before the screening exam?
Yes, as long as the question does not delay the exam or treatment. Under 489.24(d)(4)(iv), a hospital may follow reasonable registration processes, including asking whether the person is insured and what the insurance is, if that inquiry does not delay screening or treatment.
The regulation never mentions copayments. Its test is whether a request for money delays care or discourages the patient from staying. Many hospitals ask after the exam. Set the policy with compliance or counsel; this page is not legal advice.
A patient arrives at 2:10 pm with abdominal pain. The screening exam begins at 2:40. A clerk collects the insurance card at the bedside at 2:55, and the authorization call happens at 3:20, after stabilizing treatment has started. Nothing was held back for payment. Had the nurse waited at 2:12 for a copay answer, that delay is what the rule targets.
Does EMTALA prevent you from billing the patient or the insurer?
No part of 489.24 bars billing for the visit. The regulation controls timing and conduct: no payment-driven delay, no early authorization requests, no discouraging patients.
After the exam, the claim follows normal payer rules. The hospital reports the visit on the UB-04 with revenue code 0450 and the ED visit code for its level, from 99281 through 99285 for a Type A emergency department. How a hospital picks that level is on our ED facility level coding page.
Authorization is where billing staff most often slip. Because 489.24(d)(4)(ii) bars asking before the exam and the start of stabilizing treatment, an authorization rule cannot hold a patient.
How does EMTALA interact with the No Surprises Act?
EMTALA decides what care a hospital must provide, and the No Surprises Act decides what an insured patient can be billed for it. 45 CFR 149.110(c)(2)(i) defines emergency services as the screening exam required by section 1867 of the Social Security Act, plus the further exam and treatment needed to stabilize the patient. For an independent freestanding emergency department, the wording applies as if section 1867 applied to it.
The NSA definition also reaches past stabilization. Under 149.110(c)(2)(ii), out-of-network items and services after the patient is stabilized, during the same visit and as part of observation or a stay, are emergency services too, unless every condition in 149.410(b) is met. Those include the treating provider's finding that the patient can travel to a participating facility and a signed notice and consent. Our notice and consent page walks through that.
The billing limit sits in 45 CFR 149.410(a). A nonparticipating emergency facility, and a nonparticipating provider at it, must not bill a person with group or individual health coverage more than the in-network cost-sharing amount for emergency services. The rest is settled between plan and facility under the process on our No Surprises Act pages.
What documentation supports EMTALA compliance on a claim?
The record has to show that the screening exam happened and what followed. 489.24 names the entries below.
| Event | What the record must hold | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Patient refuses care | A description of the exam or treatment refused, and the hospital's reasonable steps to get the patient's written informed refusal, which records the risks and benefits explained. | 489.24(d)(3) |
| Patient refuses transfer | A description of the proposed transfer that was refused, plus the written informed refusal stating why. | 489.24(d)(5) |
| Transfer of an unstabilized patient | Either the patient's written request, with reasons and an acknowledgement of the risks, or a physician certification with a summary of risks and benefits. A qualified medical person may sign if the physician agrees and countersigns. | 489.24(e)(1) |
| Records sent with the transfer | Available records on the emergency condition, including history, signs and symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, test results, treatment given and the consent or certification. | 489.24(e)(2)(iii) |
What happens if a hospital violates EMTALA?
CMS can terminate the hospital's Medicare provider agreement under 489.53, as 489.24(g) provides. For cases that need a medical opinion, CMS asks the quality improvement organization (QIO) to review the alleged violation. The Office of Inspector General can impose civil monetary penalties or an exclusion under section 1867(d)(1) of the Social Security Act.
Under 489.24(h)(2), the QIO gives written notice by certified mail within 15 calendar days of receiving the case. The notice invites the physician and the hospital to meet with the QIO and to submit more information within 30 calendar days of receipt, which is presumed 5 days after the certified mail date. The right to be heard is waived if the invitation is not accepted.
EMTALA exposure is a compliance matter, so there is no remark code to appeal. Claim problems from the same visit follow the ordinary path in Medicare appeal levels. If this rule is costing you claims, our denial management team can help.
- 42 CFR 489.24, Special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases · eCFR
- 45 CFR 149.110, Preventing surprise medical bills for emergency services · eCFR
- 45 CFR 149.410, Balance billing in cases of emergency services · eCFR
- 45 CFR 149.30, Definitions · eCFR
We check every rule, code and deadline against the official source. See our editorial policy.
Common questions
Straight answers from the team that does the work.
Ask a billing lead directly. A 20-minute call, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm Eastern.
01Can an ER ask for insurance information before the screening exam?
Yes, if the question does not delay the exam. 42 CFR 489.24(d)(4)(iv) lets a hospital follow reasonable registration, including asking whether the patient is insured and with whom. It may not delay screening or treatment to ask, and may not seek insurer authorization until the exam is done and stabilizing treatment has started.
02Does EMTALA prevent us from billing the patient?
No. 42 CFR 489.24 limits when and how payment questions come up, not whether the hospital can bill afterward. Billing then follows the payer's rules, and for an insured patient treated out of network the No Surprises Act caps patient billing at in-network cost sharing.
03Does EMTALA apply to freestanding ERs and urgent care?
It applies to a hospital's dedicated emergency department, on or off campus, so a freestanding ER run as a hospital department is covered. An independent freestanding ER licensed separately from a hospital is not a hospital under 489.24, though the No Surprises Act uses the same screening and stabilization standard for it.
04How does EMTALA interact with the No Surprises Act?
EMTALA sets the care a hospital must give. The NSA, at 45 CFR 149.110, defines emergency services by that care, including the screening exam and stabilizing treatment, and at 149.410 limits patient billing for it. Post-stabilization services in the same visit stay emergency services unless notice and consent conditions are met.
05Can we collect a copay at the ER door?
The regulation does not mention copays. Its test is whether a request delays screening or treatment or unduly discourages the patient from staying, under 42 CFR 489.24(d)(4). Collecting before the exam risks both, so many hospitals ask after the exam. Set the policy with your compliance officer or counsel.
06What documentation supports EMTALA compliance on a claim?
The chart should show the screening exam and its result. For a refusal, it needs a description of the care refused and a written informed refusal. For a transfer of an unstabilized patient, it needs the written request or physician certification and the records sent. 489.24(d) and (e) list these.
Need help with ED claims?
We bill emergency department claims for hospitals and freestanding ERs.