The Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA), Explained
The qualifying payment amount (QPA) is the payer's own figure for what it pays in-network providers for the same service, in the same region, indexed for inflation. Federal rules at 45 CFR 149.140 set how it is calculated, and the Fifth Circuit's en banc ruling of August 11, 2026 struck parts of that method.
In short: the QPA is a median of the payer's 2019 contracted rates for the same service, specialty and region, indexed by CPI-U each year. The payer must send it with the first payment or denial. In federal IDR the entity must consider it, but the current rule lists it beside other factors and does not make it the default answer.
What is the qualifying payment amount?
The QPA is the amount a health plan or insurer calculates, under 45 CFR 149.140, from its own contracted rates with in-network providers. Section 149.140(a)(16) defines it as the amount calculated using the methodology in paragraph (c) of that section.
In plain terms, the payer takes the middle value of what it has agreed to pay in-network providers for the same service, adjusts it for inflation, and that result is the QPA. It does not come from your charges, from Medicare rates or from what you were paid last year.
The QPA does two jobs. First, in a state with no specified state law, the recognized amount for items and services from nonparticipating providers and facilities is the lesser of the QPA or the billed amount (45 CFR 149.30). The patient's cost sharing is calculated from that recognized amount. Second, the QPA is a required reference point when an out-of-network payment goes to federal IDR.
How does a payer calculate the QPA?
A payer calculates the QPA by finding the median contracted rate for the item or service on January 31, 2019, then indexing it forward by CPI-U each year. Section 149.140(b) governs the median and section 149.140(c) governs the indexing.
Step 1: collect the contracted rates
Under 45 CFR 149.140(b)(1), the payer arranges the contracted rates from least to greatest and picks the middle number. If there is an even number of rates, it averages the middle two. The set of rates is limited to the same or similar item or service, a provider in the same or similar specialty (or a facility of the same or similar type), the geographic region where the service was furnished, and the same insurance market.
| Part | What the rule says |
|---|---|
| Same or similar item or service | Billed under the same service code, or a comparable code in a different code system. Service codes are CPT, HCPCS or DRG codes (149.140(a)(13) and (14)). |
| Same or similar specialty | The practice specialty as the payer identifies it under its usual business practice. All air ambulance providers count as one specialty (149.140(a)(12)). |
| Facility type for emergency services | Either a hospital emergency department or an independent freestanding emergency department (149.140(a)(4)). |
| Insurance market | Individual market, large group market, small group market, or for self-insured plans all plans of the same sponsor (149.140(a)(8)). |
| Geographic region | One region per metropolitan statistical area in a state, plus one region for the rest of the state (149.140(a)(7)(i)(A)). |
Step 2: apply the calculation rules
Section 149.140(b)(2) requires the payer to compute the median on the full contracted rate for the service code, with set exceptions. It must calculate separate medians for CPT modifier 26 (professional component) and modifier TC (technical component). Where rates change by modifier, it calculates one median per code and modifier combination.
For payments that are not fee-for-service, such as bundled or capitated payments, the payer uses underlying fee schedule rates, or a derived amount if it has none (149.140(b)(2)(iii)). Anesthesia uses a median conversion factor, which the payer multiplies by base, time and physical status units (149.140(c)(1)(iii) and (iv)).
Step 3: index to the service year
For services furnished in 2022, the payer increased the 2019 median by the combined CPI-U increase for 2019, 2020 and 2021. For 2023 and later years, it takes the prior year's QPA and raises it by the CPI-U percentage increase for the year (149.140(c)(1)(i) and (ii)).
A payer has four in-network rates for a service in one region and specialty on January 31, 2019: $200, $240, $300 and $500. With an even count, the median is the average of $240 and $300, which is $270. If the indexing factors multiplied out to 1.10 by the year of service, the QPA would be $297. These figures are for illustration only and are not real rates or real CPI-U factors.
What is the QPA when the payer has no 2019 rate?
When a payer lacks enough 2019 data, 45 CFR 149.140(c)(3) tells it to use the median of in-network allowed amounts from an eligible database, indexed by CPI-U. Sufficient information means at least three contracted rates on January 31, 2019 (149.140(a)(15)(i)).
An eligible database is a state all-payer claims database, or a third-party database that is not owned by an insurer or provider, has enough in-network data for the region and can separate commercial in-network payments from other claims (149.140(a)(3)). The payer pays for database access (149.140(e)). Once it picks a database for an item or service in a calendar year, it must use that database through the end of that year (149.140(c)(3)(i)). For a new service code, the payer finds a reasonably related older code and applies a ratio (149.140(c)(4)(i)).
If your claim is for a service with no clear in-network history, ask the payer which route it used. Section 149.140(d)(2) requires it to identify the database on request.
What must the payer disclose with the initial payment or denial?
Under 45 CFR 149.140(d)(1), the payer must send the QPA in writing with each initial payment or notice of denial of payment, whenever the recognized amount is the QPA or the billed amount. The statement can be on paper or electronic, and it covers each item or service involved.
| Item | What to look for |
|---|---|
| QPA for each service | A dollar figure for every item or service, not a single total (d)(1)(i). |
| Downcoding statement | If the QPA rests on a downcoded service code or modifier: a statement of the downcode, why it happened, which codes or modifiers changed, and the QPA that would have applied without the change (d)(1)(ii). |
| Certification | A statement that the QPA applies for the recognized amount and that each QPA shared was determined in compliance with the section (d)(1)(iii). |
| Open negotiation and IDR statement | That you may start the 30-business-day open negotiation period generally within 30 business days of the payment or denial, and may generally start federal IDR within 4 business days after it ends (d)(1)(iv). |
| Plan identity and registration number | For disclosures required on or after August 3, 2026: the legal business name and the registration number under 149.530 (d)(1)(v). |
| Contact information | A telephone number and email address for the person or office that handles open negotiation (d)(1)(vi). |
The rule adds that, for disclosures required on or after the later of August 3, 2026 and the date the open negotiation notice can be submitted through the federal IDR portal, the statement must also tell you to notify the Secretary under 149.510(b)(1)(i). That is the payer telling you what to do. The steps themselves are on the open negotiation page.
How do I request the QPA calculation details from a payer?
Ask the payer in writing for the items 45 CFR 149.140(d)(2) lists. The payer must provide them in a timely manner on request, and the rule gives no fixed number of days.
- Whether the QPA used contracted rates that were not fee-for-service, and whether it used underlying fee schedule rates or a derived amount.
- Which eligible database was used, if the payer used one.
- The related service code, if the payer used one for a new service code.
- If applicable, a statement that its contracted rates include risk-sharing, bonus, penalty or other incentive-based or retrospective payments that were excluded from the QPA.
Keep the request and the reply in your claim file. Our post on how to request QPA calculation details covers the request in more detail.
What did the courts decide about the QPA method?
On August 11, 2026, the full Fifth Circuit held in Texas Medical Association v. HHS, No. 23-40605, that parts of the 2021 QPA rule were unlawful. The court said non-negotiated ghost rates and the blanket exclusion of bonus and incentive payments could not stand, and it upheld the exclusion of single case agreements.
| Issue | Result |
|---|---|
| Non-negotiated ghost rates in the QPA | The court vacated the parts of the July 2021 rule that require insurers to include them. It saw no line between a $0 rate and a low non-$0 one. |
| Excluding bonus, incentive, risk-sharing and retrospective payments (45 CFR 149.140(b)(2)(iv)) | The majority agreed with the plaintiffs that the exclusion conflicts with the statute's total maximum payment language. |
| Excluding single case agreements and similar one-off arrangements | The court disagreed with the plaintiffs and kept the exclusion. |
| Remedy | Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded. The court said vacatur is the default remedy and noted that agencies can use enforcement discretion so insurers keep using existing QPAs until new ones are calculated. |
A ghost rate here means a rate that appears in a payer's contract for a service the provider does not actually perform, or never negotiated. The court's own term is "non-negotiated ghost rates"; the regulation does not use the phrase.
- July 13, 2021QPA methodology publishedThe interim final rule (86 FR 36970) adds 45 CFR 149.140.
- August 24, 2023District court decisionThe Eastern District of Texas decision in TMA III; the 2026 IDR rule says it still bound the Departments pending the en banc decision.
- October 30, 2024Fifth Circuit panel opinionThe panel partly reversed the district court on QPA methodology provisions.
- May 30, 2025Panel opinion vacatedThe Fifth Circuit granted rehearing en banc and vacated the October 2024 panel opinion.
- June 4, 2026IDR operations final rulePublished at 91 FR 33900, effective August 3, 2026, with 149.510(c)(5)(iii) as the paragraph on what the entity weighs.
- August 11, 2026En banc decisionThe full Fifth Circuit vacates the ghost rate requirement, rejects the blanket bonus and incentive exclusion and keeps the single case agreement exclusion.
What role does the QPA play in IDR now?
Under 45 CFR 149.510(c)(5)(iii)(A), the certified IDR entity must consider the QPA for the applicable year for the same or similar item or service. The current text then lists other circumstances it must also consider, and it does not tell the entity to start from the QPA or treat it as presumptively right.
This paragraph was numbered (c)(4)(iii) in earlier versions of the rule. The June 4, 2026 final rule redesignated it as (c)(5)(iii). The following is what the text in eCFR said on October 20, 2026, as amended through 91 FR 55468 (August 28, 2026).
| Category | Contents |
|---|---|
| Must consider: the QPA | The QPA for the applicable year for the same or similar item or service, (c)(5)(iii)(A). |
| Must consider if submitted: five circumstances | Training, experience and quality outcomes; market share of the provider, facility or plan; patient acuity or service complexity; teaching status, case mix and scope of services of the facility; good faith efforts to contract and contracted rates in the previous 4 plan years, (c)(5)(iii)(B). |
| Must also consider | Information a party gives in response to the entity's request, and additional information relating to the offer, so long as it does not involve prohibited factors, (c)(5)(iii)(C) and (D). |
| Must not consider | Usual and customary charges, the amount that would have been billed absent the NSA, and public payor rates such as Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP and TRICARE, (c)(5)(v). |
The entity must select the offer it determines best represents the value of the qualified IDR item or service, weighing only the listed considerations (149.510(c)(5)(ii)(A)). Its written decision must explain what information showed that the chosen offer best represents value, including the weight it gave the QPA and any additional credible information (149.510(c)(5)(vi)(B)).
The June 2026 final rule says it removed redesignated paragraphs (c)(5)(iii)(E) and (c)(5)(iv) and trimmed the last sentence of (c)(5)(vi)(B) to comply with the opinion and order in TMA II. Paragraph (c)(5)(iv) now reads "[Reserved]".
Each party must also submit its offer as both a dollar amount and the corresponding percentage of the QPA, and must submit the QPA for the applicable year for the same or similar item or service (149.510(c)(5)(i)(A)(1) and (3)(iv)). For the filing steps and deadlines, see the federal IDR process.
How we handle QPA review for out-of-network claims
We treat the QPA as a document to check and file, not a number to accept. Our work on out-of-network reimbursement runs from eligibility assessment through open negotiation, dispute submissions, deadline management, documentation validation and outcome tracking, under federal IDR and applicable state pathways, including Texas TDI.
For each claim we record the QPA the payer sent, compare it with the billed service code and modifiers, and file the disclosure with the claim. We keep deadline tracking and required fees under the same controls as the rest of the dispute. We measure IDR performance by decision win rate, award-to-offer ratio, reimbursement recovered and collections, using verified case-level data.
Our out-of-network billing and IDR service covers the whole workflow. If you want us to review QPAs on your open claims, book a call.
- 45 CFR 149.140 Methodology for calculating qualifying payment amount · eCFR
- 45 CFR 149.510 Independent dispute resolution process · eCFR
- 45 CFR 149.30 Definitions (recognized amount) · eCFR
- Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations, final rule (91 FR 33900, June 4, 2026) · Federal Register
- Federal Independent Dispute Resolution Operations; Correction (91 FR 55462, August 28, 2026) · Federal Register
- Texas Medical Association v. HHS, No. 23-40605 (5th Cir. en banc, Aug. 11, 2026) · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- FAQs about ACA and CAA Implementation, Part 71 (July 30, 2025) · CMS, DOL and Treasury
We check every rule, code and deadline against the official source. See our editorial policy.
Common questions
Straight answers from the team that does the work.
Ask a billing lead directly. A 20-minute call, Monday to Friday, 9am to 5pm Eastern.
01What is the qualifying payment amount (QPA)?
The QPA is the amount a payer calculates from its own median contracted rate for the same service, specialty and region, using 2019 rates indexed by CPI-U (45 CFR 149.140). It sets the recognized amount for patient cost sharing and is a required input in federal IDR.
02How does a payer calculate the QPA?
The payer sorts its contracted rates for the same or similar service, specialty and region on January 31, 2019, takes the middle value, then raises it each year by the CPI-U increase the IRS publishes. If it lacks three rates it uses an eligible database instead (149.140(b), (c)).
03Does the payer have to show the QPA with the first payment or denial?
Yes, when the recognized amount is the QPA or the billed amount. Under 149.140(d)(1) the payer must send the QPA for each item or service in writing with each initial payment or notice of denial, plus a certification, downcoding details if any, and contact details for open negotiation.
04How do I request the QPA from a payer?
The QPA itself should already arrive with the initial payment or denial. If it did not, ask the payer in writing for it. For how it was built, request the items in 149.140(d)(2), which the payer must provide in a timely manner.
05Is the QPA the same as the median in-network rate?
Close, but not the same. The QPA starts from the median contracted rate on January 31, 2019 and is then indexed by CPI-U each year. It is also split by specialty, facility type, geographic region and insurance market, so it will differ from a current in-network median you calculate yourself.
06Can the QPA be challenged?
You can compare it with the disclosure and request the (d)(2) details on rate types, databases and excluded payments. Section 149.140(f) applies the part 150 audit procedures to check QPA compliance. Since August 11, 2026 the ghost rate and incentive payment rules are also in question.
07What are ghost rates and how do they affect the QPA?
Ghost rates are non-negotiated rates in a payer's contract for services a provider does not perform. On August 11, 2026 the en banc Fifth Circuit held the rule requiring them in the QPA unlawful and vacated those parts. The regulation itself never uses the phrase, and its text had not been updated as of October 20, 2026.
08How is the QPA used for patient cost sharing?
In a state with no specified state law, the recognized amount is the lesser of the QPA or the billed amount (45 CFR 149.30). The plan calculates the patient's cost sharing as if that recognized amount were the total charge (149.110(b)(3)(iii)), and the patient pays no more than in-network.
09Do I include the QPA in my IDR submission?
Your offer must be stated as a dollar amount and as a percentage of the QPA, and each party must submit the QPA for the applicable year for the same or similar service (149.510(c)(5)(i)(A)). The filing steps are on the federal IDR process page.
10What is the QPA for a service with no in-network rate?
If the payer has fewer than three contracted rates for 2019, it uses the median in-network allowed amount from an eligible database, indexed by CPI-U (149.140(c)(3)). For a new code it uses a related older code and a ratio (c)(4). You can ask which database it used.
11Where is the QPA methodology written down?
In 45 CFR 149.140, titled Methodology for calculating qualifying payment amount, which came from the July 13, 2021 interim final rule (86 FR 36970). The statute is 42 U.S.C. 300gg-111(a)(3)(E). The August 2026 Fifth Circuit ruling vacated parts of it.
Want your QPAs checked against the claim?
We review the QPA, the disclosure and the billed codes on your open out-of-network claims.


